|
|
Post by Bitchy Grammar Queen on Oct 9, 2024 19:36:18 GMT -5
We should prohibit posting a prime number of times consecutively, so that double and triple posting is forbidden, but quadruple posting is fine.
|
|
matt
Member
Posts: 88
|
Post by matt on Oct 9, 2024 20:57:57 GMT -5
What's the grace period between posts?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bitchy Grammar Queen on Oct 9, 2024 21:56:33 GMT -5
There isn't one. Someone else has to post inbetween.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cetasaurus on Oct 15, 2024 13:03:57 GMT -5
I don't really like that idea personally.
|
|
|
|
Post by Daryl on Oct 16, 2024 15:21:48 GMT -5
Well it's easy to shoot other people's ideas down, Cetasaurus. If you all can't agree on anything maybe we just won't have a rule about consecutive posting at all. Is that what you want?
|
|
matt
Member
Posts: 88
|
Post by matt on Oct 16, 2024 16:41:29 GMT -5
What do you want, Daryl? We always do what Cetasaurus and Bitchy Grammar Queen want, but never what Daryl wants
|
|
|
|
Post by Cetasaurus on Oct 16, 2024 19:35:31 GMT -5
Well it's easy to shoot other people's ideas down, Cetasaurus. If you all can't agree on anything maybe we just won't have a rule about consecutive posting at all. Is that what you want? Whoa there, I never said that. Let's not leap to conclusions lol. |
|
|
|
Post by Bitchy Grammar Queen on Oct 17, 2024 1:42:14 GMT -5
If no one else has any opinions on this, then we should just go with the only actual suggestion. If no one posts saying that they disagree in the next three hours, we can safely assume that everyone agrees with me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Daryl on Oct 18, 2024 0:37:25 GMT -5
What do you want, Daryl? We always do what Cetasaurus and Bitchy Grammar Queen want, but never what Daryl wants I want whatever is best for ToM 🤗 |
|
|
|
Post by Daryl on Oct 18, 2024 0:37:41 GMT -5
Well it's easy to shoot other people's ideas down, Cetasaurus. If you all can't agree on anything maybe we just won't have a rule about consecutive posting at all. Is that what you want? Whoa there, I never said that. Let's not leap to conclusions lol. I apologize for jumping to conclusions, Cetasaurus. You deserve better than that, and I let my frustration over the lack of consensus get the better of me. |
|
|
|
Post by Daryl on Oct 18, 2024 0:37:53 GMT -5
If no one else has any opinions on this, then we should just go with the only actual suggestion. If no one posts saying that they disagree in the next three hours, we can safely assume that everyone agrees with me. I have concerns about how the suggestion allowing only non-prime numbers of consecutive posts would work in practice. For example, to perform an allowed quadruple post, you would necessarily have to perform a forbidden double and triple post first. I also have concerns that a rule like this would increase the moderation load on the forum from "none" to "some". |
|
|
|
Post by Daryl on Oct 18, 2024 0:38:12 GMT -5
​
|
|
|
|
Post by Bitchy Grammar Queen on Oct 19, 2024 13:48:08 GMT -5
I have concerns about how the suggestion allowing only non-prime numbers of consecutive posts would work in practice. For example, to perform an allowed quadruple post, you would necessarily have to perform a forbidden double and triple post first. I also have concerns that a rule like this would increase the moderation load on the forum from "none" to "some". Until someone else posts, your posting streak is temporarily unknown. So, you can post a fourth post without being banned for triple posting as long as no one posts inbetween. Edit: A new prime number just came out today, so be careful not to post 2^136,279,841 - 1 times in a row. |
|
|
|
Post by Daryl on Oct 22, 2024 11:26:05 GMT -5
Hey, the rule isn't official yet. If you wanna post that many times in a row, feel free.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bitchy Grammar Queen on Oct 22, 2024 17:31:19 GMT -5
If you weren't lazy, you might consider retroactively applying the rule.
|
|
|
|
Post by Daryl on Oct 23, 2024 7:00:12 GMT -5
Lucky for everyone, I am lazy
|
|
