|
|
Post by Daryl on Apr 12, 2008 15:50:59 GMT -5
(4:39:36 PM) Alex: SHOCKSITE
(4:39:37 PM) Daryl: What else?
(4:40:18 PM) Alex: SHOCKSITE
(4:40:36 PM) Daryl: That was unpleasant
(4:40:48 PM) Alex: SHOCKSITE
(4:40:53 PM) Daryl: Don't think so
(4:40:57 PM) Alex: SHOCKSITE might work
|
|
|
|
Post by shadowdeath on Apr 12, 2008 16:23:20 GMT -5
Daryl was asking me for shock sites.
|
|
|
|
Post by Daryl on Apr 12, 2008 16:24:40 GMT -5
(4:39:28 PM) Daryl: Now I need one more thing
(4:39:32 PM) Daryl: For block evasion
(4:39:34 PM) Daryl: I have logmein
(4:39:36 PM) Daryl: VTunnel
(4:39:36 PM) Alex: SHOCKSITE
(4:39:37 PM) Daryl: What else?
(4:40:18 PM) Alex: SHOCKSITE
|
|
|
|
Post by shadowdeath on Apr 12, 2008 16:26:48 GMT -5
Daryl, posting links to shock sites is against ToM rules. You should be warned.
|
|
|
|
Post by killerinstinct on Apr 12, 2008 16:28:13 GMT -5
It is against the rules, and you should be the first to know, Daryl, as you were one of the people who contributed in making rules. I'm afraid I have to issue a warning against you.
|
|
|
|
Post by Daryl on Apr 12, 2008 16:31:40 GMT -5
Now now, such harsh measures.... How about you just give me a warning-warning? Like, next time I do this, I'll get a warning?
|
|
|
|
Post by killerinstinct on Apr 12, 2008 16:34:34 GMT -5
I'm willing to let this one pass and give you just a warning-warning if you take the links off.
|
|
|
|
Post by Daryl on Apr 12, 2008 16:36:54 GMT -5
Hmmmm.... What if I just separate the middle part, and the .com, so no one can click it, and they have to physically copy and paste it, then backspace the space?
|
|
|
|
Post by shadowdeath on Apr 12, 2008 16:40:29 GMT -5
So we get warning warnings now?
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 12, 2008 17:50:34 GMT -5
It would have to be a warning-warning. He didn't really post the site for intention of surprise and 'shock', so much as a document... Thus, none would be surprised if something would appear. (Though, still disgusted probably)
|
|
|
|
Post by shadowdeath on Apr 12, 2008 19:07:08 GMT -5
So you're saying we can post a site that is probably disgusting but we're not doing it for the intention of surprise or shock.
|
|
|
|
Post by killerinstinct on Apr 12, 2008 19:20:44 GMT -5
Personally I still think it's better to completely remove the links if we're going to let you off the hook, Daryl.
|
|
|
|
Post by Daryl on Apr 12, 2008 20:02:35 GMT -5
Well, since you only think that personally, and not officially, I think we're all set  |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 12, 2008 20:06:34 GMT -5
I agree with KI personally, thus, making it official. Remove it.
And SD, Daryl made had no intention to deceive us. We were made aware of their purpose. We still don't want them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Daryl on Apr 12, 2008 20:19:56 GMT -5
Where in the rules does it say two personals make an official?
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 12, 2008 20:45:00 GMT -5
Majority rules. Inconveniently for you, the 2 personals happen to be admins enforcing rules. In fact, I'll take the strict interpretation of the rules, and give you a warning, just because you're being such a brat.
|
|
|
|
Post by Daryl on Apr 12, 2008 20:54:30 GMT -5
Rape! RAAAPPE!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 12, 2008 20:58:11 GMT -5
Butt rape!
|
|
|
|
Post by killerinstinct on Apr 13, 2008 2:31:32 GMT -5
Majority rules. Inconveniently for you, the 2 personals happen to be admins enforcing rules. In fact, I'll take the strict interpretation of the rules, and give you a warning, just because you're being such a brat. I think you should consider yourself lucky, Daryl, that the admins never voted yes for the Asshole rule. |
|
|
|
Post by Daryl on Apr 13, 2008 10:56:14 GMT -5
I don't think the majority would vote me off the forum for one silly little incident Besides, this whole thing is Alex's fault. |
|
|
|
Post by shadowdeath on Apr 13, 2008 11:00:33 GMT -5
You can't blame me for things that didn't happen.
|
|
|
|
Post by Daryl on Apr 13, 2008 11:27:26 GMT -5
What are you claiming did not happen?
|
|
|
|
Post by Griffin on Apr 13, 2008 11:28:42 GMT -5
I'll support you, Daryl.
|
|
|
|
Post by shadowdeath on Apr 13, 2008 12:21:49 GMT -5
Well you make it seem like it was my fault.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 13, 2008 12:42:48 GMT -5
It certainly isn't your fault, SD. You spoke to Daryl in a chat session. It puts full responsibility on Daryl because he posted them on ToM.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2008 18:27:21 GMT -5
I support both!
Daryl I've known longer but can get annoying. For S-D he makes a good point.
|
|
|
|
Post by Daryl on Apr 13, 2008 18:35:13 GMT -5
Thanks, Griff |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 13, 2008 19:35:12 GMT -5
I know you're Daryl.
|
|
|
|
Post by Griffin on Apr 14, 2008 20:26:30 GMT -5
I support both! Daryl I've known longer but can get annoying. For S-D he makes a good point. S-D is sum-dude. SD is Alex (shadowdeath) There's a differance. |
|
|
|
Post by Daryl on Apr 14, 2008 20:27:54 GMT -5
It's a bit too late for that, sadly. If you'll look at the chat box, he has mistakenly killed S-D.  |
|
