|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 31, 2008 22:19:41 GMT -5
Please vote.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bitchy Grammar Queen on Mar 31, 2008 23:04:00 GMT -5
We (well maybe not me so much) have been through so much together, and I think ToM has finally run its course. We've had some good times, we've had some bad times, and we've had a whole lot of in between times. Throughout all these times though, we've finally reached a plateau. This forum will not get any worse, though it will never amount to anything more. However, this is the end just quite yet. Together, we can make a NEWER, BIGGER, BRIGHTER, BETTER ToM to last us for the years to come! It doesn't have to end like this, but it also doesn't have to remain like this. It will be the dawning of a new era for ToM that will last for several generations. This forum has had its times, and had its moments, and staying here will just lengthen the empty, boring future that this forum will have. Together, we can make a stronger, more powerful ToM- one that will last and never get old, and one that will be enjoyed by all. Together, we can make a better, more secure, more stable ToM. Together, we can make a greater, more enjoyable ToM. Together, we can make a forum for the new era. Together, we can make a new, more exciting ToM for the ages. Together, we can make a forum that will last for the many bright years to come. Having said that, I just ask of you one thing- together, just try, and we can make this forum a better place. Also, you missed the apostrophe in "ToM's".
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 31, 2008 23:17:22 GMT -5
It's debatable. If I put an apostrophe there, it'd read 'ToM is time has come'. I'd rather have no apostrophe than misuse of one.
And you certainly don't mean the inspirational shite. You just wanted to build up to the apostrophy...
|
|
|
|
Post by Bitchy Grammar Queen on Mar 31, 2008 23:19:15 GMT -5
It also helps my WhatPulse. On another note, you misspelled "apostrophe" in your last line. |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 31, 2008 23:25:44 GMT -5
Oh, I'm sorry. I was thinking trophy at the time, instead of the usual APOSTROPHE! Speaking hypothetically, it'd be difficult to rebuilt a new ToM using no current materials. If we could obtain just one or 2 more members besides you, me, and Daryl (Because KI are SD are gone, and Matt will be gone soon) then we could have a shot. If that Forest friend of yours knew that ToM was calmer, he'd like it. Alas, we don't have the activity, and I don't have the raw motivation to compete with him for Daryl here AND MSN. I have 2 friends, though. One I know will be a burden, and the other might help, but they're our last resort to judge our resources for before we leave.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bitchy Grammar Queen on Mar 31, 2008 23:29:15 GMT -5
Why did KI and SD leave? Also, since a few members here are on both XF and ToM, we could just merge the two forums or something.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 31, 2008 23:37:43 GMT -5
Absolutely wouldn't work. Never in a million years. No. If we were to do that, who's to say that your admin wouldn't carry onto there? I'm sorry, but I couldn't be able to tolerate you adminning... you're just too... uhm... do I dare say it...? Yes. You're simply too clever to be an admin.
Also, our rules would conflict quite violently. XF is much more rule-free than ToM, which is understandable, since ToM is easier to maintain.
But down to basics, ToM rules = Make a calm, pleasurable experience!
XF rules = There are rules?
If we were to merge, there'd have to be thorough planning, though if absolutely necessary, it's possible... propose the idea to Mr. Tyler, if you find the time. We could begin planning our rules. Also mention that I'd gladly allow him to be hed admin, as I acknowledge that he is much more prepared in event of an emergency.
And SD and KI haven't posted in days. Unusual for KI...
|
|
|
|
Post by killerinstinct on Apr 1, 2008 3:58:45 GMT -5
My vote goes to no. I know I haven't been posting much but... I still say no.
|
|
|
|
Post by Griffin on Apr 1, 2008 11:43:32 GMT -5
My vote goes to no. I know I haven't been posting much but... I still say no. Ditto. There isn't much to post about, though. With some more work, we could reboot it. |
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Ivo Robotnik on Apr 1, 2008 12:33:31 GMT -5
Hell no.
|
|
|
|
Post by Daryl on Apr 1, 2008 13:16:20 GMT -5
I was kidding >_>
And a ToM - XF merger would not go out well, both due to conflicting personalities, and that Michael is a large abuser of admin. Not to mention I doubt most of the people here would like it, especially those who have never even heard of XF.
|
|
|
|
Post by shadowdeath on Apr 1, 2008 14:30:32 GMT -5
My posts keep on getting censored.
Or deleted by Daryl
Anyways XF and ToM would not work. The baby would be demented.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2008 15:25:02 GMT -5
Why will I be gone soon?  |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 1, 2008 15:50:27 GMT -5
You're new. It always happens to new people.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bitchy Grammar Queen on Apr 1, 2008 16:04:49 GMT -5
If we were to do that, who's to say that your admin wouldn't carry onto there? I'm sorry, but I couldn't be able to tolerate you adminning... you're just too... uhm... do I dare say it...? Yes. You're simply too clever to be an admin. lmfao, it was worth a try, at least. I didn't think it would work well either. |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 1, 2008 16:18:27 GMT -5
If we were to do that, who's to say that your admin wouldn't carry onto there? I'm sorry, but I couldn't be able to tolerate you adminning... you're just too... uhm... do I dare say it...? Yes. You're simply too clever to be an admin. lmfao, it was worth a try, at least. I didn't think it would work well either. S-D, you're very clever, and Tyler is much smarter than me, but I'm not as dumb as you think I am. |
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on Jul 21, 2008 20:32:49 GMT -5
sup
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2009 8:07:21 GMT -5
Not much, you?
|
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on Jun 16, 2009 18:36:07 GMT -5
Same.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wulfi on Jun 17, 2009 21:23:34 GMT -5
"Jul 21, 2008"
OH WOW.
|
|
